Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42295759›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

Community Optometrist-Led Monitoring of Quiescent Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The FENETRE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Anitta Sharma, Aljazy Jaber, Bishwanath Pal, John G Lawrenson, Robert A Harper, Adnan Tufail, Annastazia E Learoyd, Emily Robinson, Abdel Douiri, Rachel Burman and 15 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03893474 (Quality-Assured Follow-up of Quiescent Neovascular Age -Related maculaR dEgeneration by Non-medical Practitioners), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03893474 naunknown statusnot on this map

Quality-Assured Follow-up of Quiescent Neovascular Age -Related maculaR dEgeneration by Non-medical Practitioners: a Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRan2019 to 2022Enrolled742ConditionsAMDArmsOCT, Visual Acuity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Anitta SharmaMoorfields Ophthalmic Reading Centre and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Aljazy JaberMoorfields Ophthalmic Reading Centre and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Bishwanath PalNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
John G LawrensonSchool of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Robert A HarperManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester University NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
Adnan TufailNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Annastazia E LearoydSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Emily RobinsonSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Abdel DouiriSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Rachel BurmanSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Ashleigh KernohanHealth Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Sofia VougioukalouCentre for Adult Social Care Research (CARE) and Centre for Trials Research (CTR), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Simon ReadNIHR Health Determinants Research Collaboration Torfaen, Torfaen County Borough Council, Torfaen, Wales, UK.
Judit CsontosWales Centre For Evidence Based Care and School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Aled JonesSchool Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Sajjad MahmoodManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester University NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
Martin McKibbinLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK.
Janet L PeacockSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Richard GaleHull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.
Praveen J PatelMoorfields Ophthalmic Reading Centre and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Pearse A KeaneMoorfields Ophthalmic Reading Centre and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Robin HamiltonNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Luke ValeHealth Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Catey BunceFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Konstantinos BalaskasMoorfields Ophthalmic Reading Centre and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Hospital-based ophthalmology faces increasing demand for long-term monitoring of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Safe redistribution of routine monitoring to community clinicians is relevant to integrated community (primary)-secondary care models. Objective: To examine whether community optometrist-led monitoring of nAMD is noninferior to hospital-based monitoring for detecting disease activity requiring treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 8, 2019, to January 31, 2024, at secondary centers (17 hospitals) and primary centers (60 community optometry practices) with 12-month follow-up. Statisticians were masked to patient grouping. Adults 55 years or older with quiescent AMD in at least 1 eye (and quiescent or nonneovascular disease in the other) were recruited at participating hospitals. Data analysis was performed from October 2024 to March 2025. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to monitoring sessions once every 2 months in hospitals (control) or community practices (intervention). Trained and accredited optometrists performed optical coherence tomography imaging, clinical examination, patient management, and online reporting at each visit. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome (participant level) was a binary indicator of whether a false-negative clinical management decision occurred at any visit within 12 months (missed quiescent nAMD reactivation or new fellow-eye nAMD, adjudicated by a central reading-center reference standard). The noninferiority margin was a 10-percentage point absolute risk difference. Secondary outcomes were false-positive clinical management decisions, attendance adherence, visual acuity change, harms, loss to follow-up, suspicious classifications, and confirmation visit outcomes. Results: Of 704 randomized participants, 635 (90.2%) completed at least 1 follow-up visit, including 287 at community practices (mean [SD] age, 80.6 [8.1] years; 236 [67.4%] female) and 348 at hospitals (mean [SD] age, 80.1 [8.5] years; 203 [57.3%] female). False-negative clinical management decisions occurred in 11 of 287 community participants (3.8%) vs 27 of 348 hospital participants (7.8%) (risk difference, -3.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.4 to -0.3 percentage points; P = .04; adjusted odds ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.24-1.07; P = .08), meeting noninferiority. False-positive clinical management decisions occurred in 24 of 287 community participants (8.4%) vs 12 of 348 hospital participants (3.5%) (risk difference, 4.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.9-9.0 percentage points). Findings were consistent across per-protocol, cluster-adjusted, and relative risk sensitivity analyses. No adverse event-related withdrawals occurred. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, community optometrist-led monitoring of quiescent nAMD was noninferior to hospital monitoring for detecting disease activity requiring treatment. These results provide evidence for its use in integrated clinical care models. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03893474.

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationOptometristsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID42295759
PMCPMC13270270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.