SynthesisThe Indian journal of medical research2026
Prevalence of hypothyroidism among pregnant women and associated feto-maternal outcomes in India: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The Indian journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives Hypothyroidism is the most common thyroid disorder during pregnancy and, if not managed adequately, increases the risk of adverse foeto-maternal outcomes. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the prevalence of hypothyroidism among Indian pregnant women and related foeto-maternal outcomes. Methods A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and preprint servers to identify observational studies reporting the prevalence of hypothyroidism and associated foeto-maternal outcomes among Indian pregnant women. A random-effects model was utilised to pool effect sizes, and heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistic. Funnel plots, along with Begg's and Egger's tests, were used to assess publication bias. Data were analysed using STATA version 17. Results A total of 60 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of hypothyroidism among pregnant women was 17% [95% confidence interval (CI): 14%, 19%] with subclinical hypothyroidism at 15% (95% CI: 12%, 18%) and overt hypothyroidism at 3% (95% CI: 3%, 4%). In women with subclinical hypothyroidism, the pooled prevalence of adverse maternal outcomes was 9% (95% CI: 6%, 11%), while the prevalence of adverse foetal outcomes was 11% (95% CI: 9%, 14%). The pooled prevalence was 18% for preterm birth (95% CI: 11%, 25%), 17% for low birth weight (95% CI: 10%, 25%), 7% for intrauterine death (95% CI: 2, 14%), and 2% for stillbirth (95% CI: 0, 4%). Among women with overt hypothyroidism, the prevalence of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes was 12% (95% CI: 10%, 15%) and 14% (95% CI: 11%, 17%), respectively. The pooled prevalence was 22% for low birth weight (95% CI: 13%, 31%), 16% for preterm birth (95% CI: 9%, 24%), 16% for intrauterine death (95% CI: 7%, 27%), and 6% for stillbirth (95% CI: 1%, 13%). Most studies used trimester-specific TSH cut-offs based on the American Thyroid Association guidelines. One fourth (n=15) of the 60 studies applied alternative thresholds, with upper limits for normal TSH varying from 4.0-10.0 mIU/L. Interpretation and conclusions The rising burden and adverse consequences of hypothyroidism in pregnancy demand urgent attention. Uniform, evidence-based screening and management practices must be implemented at all levels of care. There is a pressing need for India-specific diagnostic cut-offs and large-scale prospective studies to inform treatment thresholds and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.