ArticleOral radiology2026
A machine learning AI model for predicting condylar erosion in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders and analyzing factors contributing to prediction.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis, condylar erosion is considered a sign of disease progression. Few studies have clarified the extent to which clinical and imaging findings are associated with erosion. The purpose of this study was to develop a machine learning model to predict condylar erosion and identify the parameters contributing to prediction.
methodsWe enrolled 197 patients (394 joints) in this study. Condylar erosion was determined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and panoramic radiographs. Clinical data included age, sex, duration of symptoms, maximum mouth opening, joint sounds, temporomandibular joint pain, and masticatory muscle pain. MRI findings were evaluated for disc shape and position, signal changes at the posterior disc attachment (PDA), joint effusion, bone edema, condylar position, and limited movement. Erosion prediction was performed using clinical and MRI data with Prediction One and random forest models. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. Parameters contributing to prediction were analyzed.
resultsPrediction One showed AUC 0.845, accuracy 0.779, sensitivity 0.777, and specificity 0.780. Random forest had AUC 0.836, accuracy 0.759, sensitivity 0.777, and specificity 0.753. The top five parameters contributing to prediction in Prediction One were signal changes at PDA, disc position, bone edema, disc shape, and joint effusion; in random forest, these were disc position, joint effusion, signal changes at PDA, bone edema, and disc shape.
conclusionsWe developed a highly accurate model for predicting condylar erosion and identified those parameters contributing to the prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42295678What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.