ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2026
MRI-based assessment for optimal breast cancer local therapy in the era of BI-RADS v2025.
Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive modality for assessing disease extent in newly diagnosed breast cancer, detecting additional ipsilateral disease in approximately 20% of patients. While its impact on patients' prognosis is debated, MRI may refine surgical management when it is appropriately evaluated. This review provides a practical framework for optimizing MRI interpretation for individualized surgical planning, incorporating the updated American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) v2025 recommendations. Key updates in BI-RADS v2025 include the introduction of "Additional Close Findings" to streamline the management of suspicious lesions within 2.0 cm of the index cancer. For oncoplastic procedures, MRI provides critical metrics: a tumor-nipple distance of > 1.0 cm has been reported as a significant threshold under specific study conditions for predicting nipple involvement in nipple-sparing mastectomy, while an MRI-to-skin distance of 5 mm is a suggested threshold for predicting margin positivity in skin-sparing mastectomy. This review also addresses the assessment of pectoralis muscle involvement and the new BI-RADS section dedicated to lymph node evaluation. Furthermore, MRI is highlighted as an essential tool for identifying eligible candidates for radiofrequency ablation by precisely excluding multifocality and extensive intraductal components to satisfy strict clinical criteria. The integration of these standardized, surgically-relevant metrics allows radiologists to provide a detailed anatomical roadmap, which is essential to maximize cosmetic outcomes through conservative mastectomy techniques without compromising oncological safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.