ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2026
Ethics and Autonomy in Schizophrenia Care : Reflections from a Latin American Perspective.
Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioethics has undergone significant evolution in recent decades, particularly in its application to medical sciences and mental health. Its purpose has been to provide solutions to ethical conflicts that arise in healthcare. In this paper, we review the principle of autonomy in the context of people diagnosed with schizophrenia. In schizophrenia, the main difficulty people face is the ability to make decisions autonomously. This ability is affected primarily by the fluctuating nature of the symptoms and particularly their impact on cognition and judgement. This paper discusses the aspects of this condition that affect autonomy and how to address them from a healthcare perspective, with a view to avoiding depersonalization and respecting people's right to make decisions about their lives and treatment. Securing these aims proves to be highly complex when a person's consent must be obtained and health conditions prevent them from exercising this capacity. The possibility of establishing a balance between autonomy and obtaining the best possible care is an ethical dilemma that persists in mental health treatment, particularly for people diagnosed with schizophrenia. In this situation, advance directives in psychiatry are a viable mechanism to sustain the exercise of autonomy. However, they are still under-utilized, and some medical teams resist their implementation. In Latin America, their use is more restricted. With this in mind, it is necessary to discuss projections for their use, the requirements for their implementation, and to generate reflection among professionals regarding the bioethical and legal challenges raised by the prospect of incorporating advance directives in the treatment of people with schizophrenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42295548What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.