Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42295533›Full record

ArticleOdontology2026

Effect of post-processing washing duration on the optical, surface, and mechanical properties of additively manufactured resins at different printing layer thicknesses: an in vitro study.

Dalndushe Abdulai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dalndushe AbdulaiDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Biruni University, Istanbul, Turkey. dyshedyshe@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8994-7262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated the effect of post-processing washing duration and printing layer thicknesses on the optical, surface, and mechanical properties of additively manufactured (AM) resins across different resin types. Disc specimens (15-mm diameter × 2-mm thickness) of Saremco Print Crowntec (SC) and VarseoSmile TriniQ (VC) were printed at 50 μm and 100 μm (90° orientation; n = 10/group), ultrasonically washed in 99.9% isopropanol (IPA) for 5, 10, or 15 min, post-cured, and polished. Color coordinates (L*, a*, b*), translucency parameter (TP), surface roughness (Ra), and Vickers hardness (VHN) were measured. The effects of washing duration and layer thickness were analyzed within each resin type using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). Washing duration significantly affected the color coordinates of the VC resin at both layer thicknesses (P < 0.001), and significantly reduced TP values (P < 0.001). In contrast, the SC resin showed no significant differences in color coordinates or TP across washing durations (P ≥ 0.178). Surface roughness increased with prolonged washing in VC at 50 μm (P < 0.001) and in SC at 100 μm (P < 0.001), while no significant differences were observed in VC at 100 μm (P = 0.649) or SC at 50 μm (P = 0.084). Washing duration also reduced Vickers hardness in VC (P = 0.004), particularly at 50 μm, whereas in SC, hardness was primarily influenced by layer thickness rather than washing duration. These findings indicate that the influence of post-processing washing duration on optical, surface, and mechanical properties is material- and thickness-dependent, highlighting the importance of optimizing washing protocols; however, clinical extrapolation of these results should be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

Additive manufacturingOptical propertiesPost-processing washingSurface roughnessVickers hardness

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.