ReviewOdontology2026
Mechanical, biological, optical, and clinical properties of 3d-printed denture base resins: a comprehensive narrative review.
Review in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review synthesizes current evidence regarding the accuracy, mechanical, biological, optical, and clinical performance of 3D-printed denture base resins. The literature indicates that CAD-CAM milled denture base resins generally exhibit superior mechanical properties, such as flexural strength and hardness, and lower microbial adhesion compared to both conventional and 3D-printed materials. Conversely, 3D-printed resins tend to show more variable and often lower mechanical performance, as well as increased susceptibility to microbial colonization and color instability in numerous in vitro studies. Nevertheless, additive manufacturing provides advantages including greater workflow efficiency, reduced material waste, and enhanced design flexibility. Recent material modifications, such as nanoparticle reinforcement and improved post-processing protocols, have demonstrated potential for performance enhancement. Current evidence, predominantly from in vitro studies, suggests that 3D-printed denture base resins are promising; however, their long-term clinical performance and durability have yet to be firmly established. Well-designed clinical studies are needed to confirm their effectiveness and reliability for routine prosthodontic use. 3D-printed denture base resins may be considered for selected clinical scenarios, particularly where reduced treatment time and increased workflow efficiency are priorities, but their use should be approached cautiously due to the limited long-term clinical data currently available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42295530What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.