Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42295512›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026

Lumboperitoneal versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery in adult post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sangmin Lee, Hannah Oh, Chang-Ho Kim, Taegon Kim, Minjoon Kim, Myungsoo Kim, Seongyun Kim, Seong-Hyun Park, Min-Ah Jo, Eunhee Park and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sangmin Lee *Department of Neurosurgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 700-721, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1311-6755
Hannah Oh *School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4778-3797
Chang-Ho KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7552-8200
Taegon KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 700-721, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9085-1083
Minjoon KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 700-721, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0515-829X
Myungsoo KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 700-721, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2764-2508
Seongyun KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 700-721, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7347-9953
Seong-Hyun ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 700-721, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0982-5338
Min-Ah JoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 700-721, Republic of Korea.
Eunhee ParkDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6553-2321
Kyunghun KangDepartment of Neurology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7248-2681
Irin Sultana Nila *Department of Neurosurgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 700-721, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2792-2139
Ki-Su Park *Department of Neurosurgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 700-721, Republic of Korea. kiss798@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4829-6299

Funding

Korea Dementia Research Center RS-2024-00342071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal shunt strategy for adult posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) remains uncertain. Although ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) is widely used, it is associated with notable complications related to ventricular catheterization. Lumboperitoneal shunting (LPS) offers a less invasive alternative by avoiding ventricular access. This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the complication profiles of LPS and VPS in adult PHH. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for original studies that reported postoperative complications in adults with PHH treated with LPS or VPS. Primary outcome was shunt-related complications; secondary outcomes included shunt-failure, obstruction, infection, and shunt complication in severe stage PHH. Two authors independently performed data extraction and quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. Pooled proportions were estimated using single-arm random-effects meta-analyses with restricted maximum likelihood and Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation, with back-transformation applied for reporting. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251143570). Of 3,183 records screened, 10 studies comprising 1,410 patients met inclusion criteria. Overall evidence quality ranged from moderate to high. The pooled shunt complication proportion was 0.37 (95% CI, 0.30-0.45) for LPS and 0.24 (95% CI, 0.13-0.37) for VPS, with substantial heterogeneity observed among VPS cohorts (LPS: I

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageCerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsHydrocephalusHumansPostoperative ComplicationsVentriculoperitoneal ShuntCerebrospinal fluid diversionLumboperitoneal shuntMeta-analysisPosthemorrhagic hydrocephalusSystematic reviewVentriculoperitoneal shunt

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.