Observational studyJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026
Evaluation of the comprehensive score for financial toxicity measure in a multicenter cohort of adults with advanced liver disease.
Observational study in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping the health management journey of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluates the psychometric properties of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) measure in a multicenter cohort of patients with advanced liver disease (AdvLD).
methodsBetween April 12, 2023, and April 30, 2024, a sample of adults undergoing liver transplantation evaluation was recruited from 13 U.S. transplant centers. We evaluated structural validity using factor analysis and internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was assessed by examining correlations between the COST measure, health-related unmet social needs, and EQ-5D-5L scores.
resultsAmong the 459 participants, more than half were male (59%), White (82%), and not Hispanic or Latino (77%). Approximately 44% were unable to work due to illness or disability, and over 44% had an annual household income below $50,000. The COST measure demonstrated suboptimal structural validity based on both one- and two-factor models. Cronbach's alpha for the COST measure was 0.84. The total COST score showed mild to moderate correlations with health-related unmet social needs (r: -0.21 to -0.41) and small correlations with the EQ-5D-5 L visual analogue scale (r = 0.24) and pattern scores (r = 0.34). DISCUSSION: Caution may be warranted when applying COST to patients with AdvLD, as suboptimal structural and construct validity compromise score interpretation and clinical utility. Future studies should systematically review evidence on its psychometric properties and evaluate content validity through cognitive interviews with patients with AdvLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.