Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42295404›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026

Transport and destination hospital for patients with suspected multiple and/or severe injuries - a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.

Florian Pavlu, Nadja Könsgen, Dan Bieler, Käthe Goossen, Bernhard Gliwitzky, David Häske, Philipp Faul, Christoph Wölfl, Johannes Strobel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Florian PavluDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery, Hand Surgery and Burn Medicine, German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany. dr.florian.pavlu@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8855-2166
Nadja KönsgenInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5387-7119
Dan BielerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery, Hand Surgery and Burn Medicine, German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0708-1259
Käthe GoossenInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1436-1144
Bernhard GliwitzkyMegaMed Notfallmanagement Gbr, Maikammer, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5320-2797
David HäskeCenter for Public Health and Health Services Research (ZÖGV), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5190-3937
Philipp FaulDepartment of Emergency and Rescue Medicine, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8568-4578
Christoph WölflMusculoskeletal Center, Marienhaus Klinikum Neuwied am Rhein, Neuwied, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4717-6498
Johannes StrobelADAC Air Rescue, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4899-3489

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur aim was to update the evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations on criteria for transport and destination hospital for patients with suspected multiple and/or severe injuries based on available evidence. This guideline topic is part of the 2025 update of the German Guideline on the Treatment of Patients with Multiple and/or Severe Injuries.

methodsMEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched to January/February 2024. Further literature reports were obtained from clinical experts. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies reporting risk-adjusted outcomes were included if they compared different transport strategies or destination hospitals for patients with (suspected) multiple and/or severe injuries. We considered patient-relevant outcomes such as mortality and neurological outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed at outcome level using ROBINS-I for observational studies and RoB 2 for RCTs. We conducted meta-analyses if possible; alternatively, we synthesised the evidence narratively. We used GRADE to rate the certainty of evidence. Expert consensus was used to develop recommendations and determine their strength.

resultsA total of 127 studies were identified. They addressed helicopter vs. ground emergency medical services (EMS) transport, ground EMS with vs. without a physician, on-scene time, and handover on arrival at the hospital. Studies on destination hospitals have compared trauma centres at different levels, the nearest hospital vs. higher-level trauma centres, or hospitals with specialised services for trauma patients in general or specific subgroups, among others. Four recommendations were modified and five additional recommendations were developed. The guideline panel rejected one proposed recommendation. All accepted recommendations (n=8) achieved strong consensus.

conclusionThe key recommendations are summarised as follows: 1. For the prehospital management of severe trauma, helicopter emergency medical services should be deployed, taking into account operational and tactical considerations. 2. Prolong the on-scene time only to perform indicated, stabilising therapeutic interventions. 3. For patients with penetrating or perforating torso trauma, keep the prehospital rescue time as short as possible. 4. Transport patients with severe blunt trauma primarily to a regional or supraregional trauma centre. 5. Transport patients with penetrating or perforating trauma to the nearest appropriate hospital capable of providing definitive haemorrhage control. 6. Patients with severe traumatic brain injury should primarily be transported to the nearest trauma centre with 24-hour availability of neurotraumatological expertise. 7. The following patients should be transported to a supraregional trauma centre: • Patients with unstable pelvic fractures and hemodynamic instability; • Patients with neurological deficits following spinal injury. 8. Use a standardized handover concept in the trauma bay.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesMultiple TraumaTransportation of PatientsHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicDestinationDestination hospitalGuidelineHand overSeverely injuredTransport

Identifiers

PMID42295404
PMCPMC13269396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.