SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026
Transport and destination hospital for patients with suspected multiple and/or severe injuries - a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.
Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOur aim was to update the evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations on criteria for transport and destination hospital for patients with suspected multiple and/or severe injuries based on available evidence. This guideline topic is part of the 2025 update of the German Guideline on the Treatment of Patients with Multiple and/or Severe Injuries.
methodsMEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched to January/February 2024. Further literature reports were obtained from clinical experts. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies reporting risk-adjusted outcomes were included if they compared different transport strategies or destination hospitals for patients with (suspected) multiple and/or severe injuries. We considered patient-relevant outcomes such as mortality and neurological outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed at outcome level using ROBINS-I for observational studies and RoB 2 for RCTs. We conducted meta-analyses if possible; alternatively, we synthesised the evidence narratively. We used GRADE to rate the certainty of evidence. Expert consensus was used to develop recommendations and determine their strength.
resultsA total of 127 studies were identified. They addressed helicopter vs. ground emergency medical services (EMS) transport, ground EMS with vs. without a physician, on-scene time, and handover on arrival at the hospital. Studies on destination hospitals have compared trauma centres at different levels, the nearest hospital vs. higher-level trauma centres, or hospitals with specialised services for trauma patients in general or specific subgroups, among others. Four recommendations were modified and five additional recommendations were developed. The guideline panel rejected one proposed recommendation. All accepted recommendations (n=8) achieved strong consensus.
conclusionThe key recommendations are summarised as follows: 1. For the prehospital management of severe trauma, helicopter emergency medical services should be deployed, taking into account operational and tactical considerations. 2. Prolong the on-scene time only to perform indicated, stabilising therapeutic interventions. 3. For patients with penetrating or perforating torso trauma, keep the prehospital rescue time as short as possible. 4. Transport patients with severe blunt trauma primarily to a regional or supraregional trauma centre. 5. Transport patients with penetrating or perforating trauma to the nearest appropriate hospital capable of providing definitive haemorrhage control. 6. Patients with severe traumatic brain injury should primarily be transported to the nearest trauma centre with 24-hour availability of neurotraumatological expertise. 7. The following patients should be transported to a supraregional trauma centre: • Patients with unstable pelvic fractures and hemodynamic instability; • Patients with neurological deficits following spinal injury. 8. Use a standardized handover concept in the trauma bay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.