Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42295403›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Spinal cord lesion characteristics and early standing ability with and without epidural stimulation.

Enrico Rejc, Andrew C Smith, Claudia A Angeli, Kenneth A Weber Ii, M J Negahdar, Katherine Smulligan, Jordan Connor, Gail F Forrest, Robert J Bert, Maxwell Boakye and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Enrico Rejc *Tim and Caroline Reynolds Center for Spinal Stimulation, Kessler Foundation, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ, 07052, USA. erejc@kesslerfoundation.org.
Andrew C Smith *Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Claudia A AngeliTim and Caroline Reynolds Center for Spinal Stimulation, Kessler Foundation, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ, 07052, USA.
Kenneth A Weber IiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, 94305, USA.
M J NegahdarDepartment of Radiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Katherine SmulliganDivision of Sports Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Jordan ConnorDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Gail F ForrestTim and Caroline Reynolds Center for Spinal Stimulation, Kessler Foundation, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ, 07052, USA.
Robert J BertDepartment of Radiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Maxwell BoakyeDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Susan J HarkemaTim and Caroline Reynolds Center for Spinal Stimulation, Kessler Foundation, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ, 07052, USA.

Funding

Improving mechanistic understanding of responsiveness to spinal cord stimulation after spinal cord injuryK01HD106928 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SMITH, ANDREW CRAIG · 2022 to 2025
$508k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD106928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current evidence suggests that spinal cord epidural stimulation (scES) can promote aspects of motor recovery for standing, stepping and volitional lower limb movement in research participants with spinal cord injury (SCI), although the extent of such recovery varies among individuals. The goal of this retrospective cohort study was to assess (i) whether the early application of scES, prior to any training with scES, is sufficient to enhance standing ability; and (ii) which magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers of spinal cord lesion, if any, are associated with early responsiveness to scES for standing. Twenty-nine non-ambulatory individuals with chronic, severe SCI (n = 27 clinically motor complete; n = 2 motor incomplete) underwent spinal cord MRI and were subsequently implanted with scES. Standing ability was assessed prior to epidural stimulator implant and after implant with scES parameters targeted to facilitate standing (Stand-scES). T2-weighted MRI was used to measure the following spinal cord lesion characteristics: lesion length, midsagittal tissue bridges, and estimates of spared tissue in the anterior, posterior, right, and left spinal cord regions. Early application of continuous Stand-scES significantly improved the ability to stand for longer periods (+ 17%, P = 0.040) and with greater outcomes of independent lower limb extension (P values 0.009-0.042) compared to pre-implant, although responses varied across participants. Notably, shorter spinal cord lesion length and the presence of tissue bridge at the lesion site were positively associated with standing ability promoted by Stand-scES (P values 0.011-0.033). The proposed MRI lesion markers may clarify expectations of early standing recovery with Stand-scES.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionSpinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord StimulationStanding PositionAdultCohort StudiesEpidural SpaceFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesEpidural stimulationLesion lengthSpinal cord injurySpinal cord MRIStandingTissue bridge

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.