Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42295367›Full record

ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2026

Corticotomy-assisted application of different miniplates and intermaxillary elastics : Comparison of the effectiveness after growth spurt in individuals with skeletal class III malocclusion.

Alara Unal Bayraktar, Ahmet Yagci, Onur Ocal, Ahmet Emin Demirbas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alara Unal BayraktarFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Ahmet YagciFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey. dtahmetyagci@gmail.com.
Onur OcalFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Ahmet Emin DemirbasFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis prospective randomized clinical study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of maxillary protraction with differently located miniplates combined with intermaxillary elastic applications after corticotomy in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion.

methodsTwenty patients aged 13-15 years were randomly assigned to one of three groups using a computer-generated random sequence. In the AS and MS groups, an acrylic splint (AS) with hooks in the upper molar region was cemented; the MS group additionally received two palatal miniscrews (MS) for anchorage. In all patients, incomplete Le Fort I osteotomy was performed. Miniplates were placed vertically between the mandibular canine and first premolar in all groups, and horizontally under the osteotomy line in the MP group. Class III elastics were applied 5 days postsurgery and continued until a positive overjet was achieved. Cephalometric radiographs were taken at the beginning of treatment (T0) and at the end of the protraction period (T1).

resultsThe MP group exhibited the greatest maxillary advancement (3.2 ± 2.2 mm, p < 0.05). Significant B‑point changes occurred in the MP (-1.2 ± 1 mm, p < 0.05) and AS (-0.9 ± 0.9 mm, p < 0.05) groups. The AS group had the largest increase in upper incisor angulation (U1-SN: 5.5° ± 2.5; U1-PP: 4.7° ± 3.3, p < 0.05). All groups showed favorable soft tissue changes; in the MS group the best control of mandibular clockwise rotation was achieved. The duration of protraction period was 5.52 ± 0.9 months for the MP group, 4.84 ± 1.3 months for the AS group, and 4.74 ± 1.18 months for the MS group.

conclusionAlthough significant improvement was observed in maxillomandibular relations in all groups, the greatest change was observed in the MP group (p < 0.01). The use of skeletal anchorage helped reduce dentoalveolar changes. The MS group was most successful in controlling clockwise rotation of the mandible.

Indexed as

Class III malocclusionGrowth spurtMaxillary protractionMiniplatesSkeletal anchorage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.