ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2026
Examining Functional Limitation Trajectories Among Adults Experiencing Homelessness Versus the General Adult Population in Los Angeles County.
Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPeople experiencing homelessness have disproportionately high rates of early-onset geriatric conditions and decades-early mortality. These phenomena are well documented but not well understood, particularly for younger adults experiencing homelessness (e.g., those aged 18-39 years). This cross-sectional study compares functional limitation prevalences in a sample of adults experiencing homelessness with those in the general adult population in Los Angeles County.
methodsThe Periodic Assessment of Trajectories of Housing, Homelessness, and Health Study indentified adults experiencing homelessness in Los Angeles County (analytic sample n=633); 2019-2023 American Community Survey data defined the adult Los Angeles County population (weighted n=7,790,124). Overall, age-specific, and age- and sex-standardized functional limitation item prevalences were calculated and compared between the two samples.
resultsStudy participants aged 25-59 years, men, and non-Hispanic Black individualswere overrepresented compared to Los Angeles County adults. Overall and age-specific functional limitations were higher and did not uniformly increase among study participants versus Los Angeles County adults (55% vs 13% reporting any functional limitation, respectively). The age- and sex-standardized prevalence of any functional limitation was 59%-6.2 times higher among study participants versus Los Angeles County adults.
conclusionsThis work adds to the literature documenting a substantial functional limitation burden among unhoused populations. Functional limitation prevalences were elevated but showed no consistent trend by age in the Periodic Assessment of Trajectories of Housing, Homelessness, and Health Study; age and sex distribution differences did not explain differences between the two samples.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.