ArticleClinical cardiology2026
Impact of Cardiovascular Specialty Care Based on the Humanistic Concept on Medication Adherence, Glycolipid Metabolism Parameters, and Quality of Life in High-Risk Cardiovascular Patients With Lipid Management.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on Wang et al.: Unaddressed Multiple Comparisons Risk Inflating Type, Error in Cardiovascular Specialty Nursing Research.Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
- Impact of Cardiovascular Specialty Care Based on the Humanistic Concept on Medication Adherence, Glycolipid Metabolism Parameters, and Quality of Life in High-Risk Cardiovascular Patients With Lipid Management.Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effects of cardiovascular specialty nursing based on the humanistic concept on medication adherence, glycolipid metabolism parameters, psychological status, self-management ability, and quality of life in high-risk cardiovascular patients undergoing lipid management.
methodsIn this retrospective study, 115 high-risk cardiovascular patients admitted between December 2023 and November 2024 were selected from the medical record system and divided into two groups: a control group (n = 55, conventional care) and an observation group (n = 60, humanistic concept-based specialty nursing). Outcomes compared included medication adherence assessed by the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), glycolipid metabolism parameters including glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h postprandial glucose (2hPG), triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), psychological status assessed by the State Anxiety Inventory (S-AI) and Trait Anxiety Inventory (T-AI) of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), self-management ability assessed by the Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale (ESCA), and quality of life assessed by the Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74).
resultsThe observation group demonstrated significantly higher total medication adherence (95.00% vs. 81.82%, χ² = 4.973, p < 0.05). Post-intervention, all glycolipid metabolic indicators (HbA1c, FPG, 2hPG, TG, TC, LDL-C), as well as S-AI and T-AI anxiety scores, were significantly lower in the observation group compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Additionally, the observation group showed significantly higher scores in all ESCA self-management domains (self-concept, self-care responsibility, self-care skills, and health knowledge) and across all GQOLI-74 quality of life dimensions (material life, somatic function, social function, and psychological function) (p < 0.05).
conclusionCardiovascular specialty care based on the humanistic concept was associated with improvements in medication adherence, glycolipid metabolism parameters, psychological status, self-management ability, and quality of life in high-risk cardiovascular patients, suggesting high clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.