ArticleInternational nursing review2026
Preventive Support Strategies for the Second Victim Phenomenon in Nurses: A Mixed-Method Study.
Article in International nursing review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo identify nurses' preventive support needs related to the second victim phenomenon and develop consensus-based strategies.
backgroundPatient safety incidents can trigger the second victim phenomenon, causing psychological distress among healthcare professionals. While early approaches focused on post-incident support, recent research emphasizes preventive strategies. Pre-incident support remains limited, underscoring the need for nursing-specific preventive strategies.
methodsA convergent mixed-methods design combined focus group interviews and a three-round Delphi survey. Eleven nurses explored preventive support needs through thematic analysis. Fourteen experts evaluated necessity, feasibility, and validity via Delphi. Reporting followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research and Guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies.
resultsNurses experienced emotional distress, stigma, and turnover intentions, exacerbated by limited formal support. Four key components were identified: incident prevention and response, understanding of the second victim phenomenon, post-incident support, and access to resources. Key strategies included case-based education, empathy training, and anonymous digital delivery. Experts validated these measures and advocated for systematic integration into institutional frameworks. DISCUSSION: Findings align with and extend recent international models of second victim support. Blame-prone cultures, hierarchical structures, and shift-based work shaped distress and preferences for anonymous digital support, with managerial engagement as a cross-cutting enabler.
conclusionPreventive education, leadership engagement, and organizational preparedness should be embedded into routine systems to ensure accessible and sustainable support for second victims. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Preventive second victim interventions should be integrated into orientation programs, with leadership training to foster psychological safety and digital platforms to expand access for shift-based nurses. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICY: Prevention strategies should be embedded in national guidelines and accreditation standards, requiring standardized protocols, dedicated funding, and coordinated policy commitment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.