ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026
Playing it safe at early life stages: Balancing energy allocations to maximize fitness under seasonal pathogen dynamics.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Playing it safe at early life stages: Balancing energy allocations to maximize fitness under seasonal pathogen dynamics.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune responses are crucial to not only control within-host disease dynamics and potential negative outcomes to host health but also impose energetic trade-offs with growth and other physiological processes. Although these trade-offs play an important role in disease outcomes, we lack mathematical models that mechanistically describe how variations in energy investment and parental reproductive timing influence offspring survival under seasonal pathogen dynamics. Here, we determine the strategies (set of tactics-growth versus immune defence-over time) that maximize host fitness under persistent infections by implementing dynamic optimization state models. We modelled individual trajectories for 1 year and accounted for natural fluctuations in resource availability. We parameterized the model using field and experimental data from a well-studied host-pathogen system: the coqui frog (Eleutherodactylus coqui) and the amphibian chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis). This data from field monitoring and controlled experiments enable robust parameter estimation and subsequent validation using empirical data. Our models identified critical windows that maximize individual growth while limiting mortality under increased pathogen burden. Individuals generally chose growth but shifted to defence when approaching near-lethal infection levels. Seasonality in pathogen exposure and foraging success exacerbated growth-defence trade-offs, leading to delayed maturity and lower survival rates when frogs hatched under unfavourable conditions. Our simulations provide a mechanistic view that explains empirical results showing that periods of highest reproductive activity align with high-resource availability and low pathogen risk. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that shifts in energy-allocation modulate infections and constrain fitness traits. Our results highlight the utility of dynamic state-variable models to examine how host fitness strategies impact early-life growth rates and recruitment (number of offspring reaching maturity). We provide detailed instructions that allow extending the application of this model to other systems. By adjusting parameter values using empirical data, this model approach can be applied to predict fitness under current and future conservation challenges, such as extreme droughts and pathogen outbreaks, and to identify the optimal time for releasing individuals in species reintroduction programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.