ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2026
Host-directed immune therapies: a second front in the battle against sepsis.
Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in screening, diagnosis, prognosis and personalized treatment of sepsis.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2026Review
- Next-generation anti-infective drugs in the post-antibiotic era: focusing on anti-virulence agents targeting the bacterial quorum sensing system.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Each year, sepsis claims more lives in the United States than many major cancers and HIV/AIDS combined, yet therapeutic progress has been modest. Adding to this crisis is the alarming rise of multidrug-resistant "superbugs," which increasingly render conventional antibiotics ineffective. Pathogen-targeted antibiotics will always remain a cornerstone of sepsis treatment, and research into novel antibiotics must continue unabated. However, the consistent mortality in sepsis tells us this approach is insufficient. Most deaths in sepsis do not occur during the early cytokine storm-driven hyper-inflammatory phase but rather days or weeks after the initial insult, during a protracted phase of immune suppression. Here, we make the case that a crucial way to reduce sepsis mortality lies in restoration of the patient's immune competence, enabling the patient to contain and kill the invading microbes. Adjuvant immune therapies will not only enable killing of the initial, invading pathogens but also prevent secondary, hospital-acquired infections. Immunotherapy revolutionized oncology by challenging the assumption that cancer was best treated through cytotoxic or targeted tumor-directed approaches, and sepsis now stands at a similar inflection point. We argue that embracing immune restoration as a core therapeutic objective offers the most promising means to improve survival in this lethal disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.