ReviewProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026
Mass spectrometry proteomics for studying mitostasis.
Review in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mass spectrometry proteomics for studying mitostasis.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maintaining mitochondrial integrity and function is fundamental to cellular homeostasis. Cells rely on coordinated protein quality control (QC) systems-including intricate chaperone-protease networks, the ubiquitin-proteasome system, and cytosolic surveillance pathways-that together form a dynamic, cell-wide mitostasis network governing the import, folding, synthesis, and degradation of mitochondrial proteins. Disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis, for example, by impairing mitochondrial protein import, induces proteotoxic stress and contributes to human disease. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics has established itself as an indispensable method to dissect mitostasis at unprecedented depth by enabling systematic quantitative analysis of protein abundance, localization, interactions, stability, and dynamics. In this review, we highlight state-of-the-art MS technologies and multifaceted proteomics approaches used to study mitostasis on a proteome-wide level. These functional analysis approaches build on quantitative MS methods employing label-free, metabolic, and chemical labeling strategies, which allow precise tracking of proteome dynamics in response to different cellular conditions including stress. Spatial and interaction-based approaches, such as affinity purification-MS, proximity labeling, and complexome profiling, provide detailed insight into the organization and regulation of the complex mitochondrial organizing system, chaperone networks, and protein QC pathways. Furthermore, we discuss advanced methodologies such as nascent chain and dynamic proteomics strategies, which offer a proteome-wide comprehension of early stress responses and fast regulation. The skillful integration of temporal, spatial subcellular, interaction, nascent, and dynamic proteomics approaches now enables a systems-level assessment of mitostasis, paving the way for a holistic while nuanced understanding of this essential cellular process and the underlying molecular mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.