Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42294553›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic cytopathology2026

Diagnostic Accuracy of USG/CT-Guided FNAC With Rapid On-Site Evaluation in Nodular Liver Lesions: Cytology-Histopathology Correlation.

M O Jeny, Lekha K Nair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic cytopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M O JenyDepartment of Pathology, Ahalia Women and Children Hospital, Thrissur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7768-7691
Lekha K NairDepartment of Pathology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4619-1071

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUSG/CT-guided FNACs are a safe, sensitive and specific method to diagnose various liver lesions. Nodular liver lesions have diverse etiologies. FNAC study of liver nodules can help in early diagnosis of various diseases and can also provide material for ancillary techniques if needed.

methodsForty-seven patients who were detected to have nodular liver lesions by USG/CT imaging were chosen and subjected to FNA with ROSE followed by trucut biopsy under USG/CT guidance. This study was done in age group of 30-85 years over a period of 18 months.

resultsOut of 47 cases in cytology, 17 cases (36.17%) were hepatocellular carcinomas, 8 cases (17.02%) were adenocarcinoma metastasis, 2 cases were each of granuloma (4.2%) and liver abscess (4.2%), one case was metastasis from squamous cell carcinoma (2.12%), and 6 cases were poorly differentiated carcinoma (12.7%); 7 cases (14.84%) were inconclusive cytologically, and 4 cases (8.5%) were cytologically negative. FNAC of liver lesions showed sensitivity of 95.10% and a specificity of 83%, positive predictive value was 97.50% and negative predictive value was 71.40%. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 93%. In our study, primary hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common malignancy (36%), followed by metastasis (17%). Females formed the majority of cases (52%) with peak incidence between 61 and 70 years.

conclusionUSG/CT-guided FNAC demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy especially when combined with ROSE and good cytology-histopathology concordance in the evaluation of nodular liver lesions.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsy, Fine-NeedleFemaleHumansLiverMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray Computedhepatocellular carcinomametastatic liver lesionsnodular liver lesionsrapid onsite evaluation (ROSE)USG/CT guided FNAC

Identifiers

PMID42294553
PMCPMC13428471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.