ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026
Joint-specific measures improve risk adjustment in total knee arthroplasty: A machine learning approach.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Joint-specific measures improve risk adjustment in total knee arthroplasty: A machine learning approach.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAccurate risk adjustment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential for outcome prediction and quality assessment. Most existing prediction models rely solely on patient demographics and comorbidities and do not account for joint-specific pathology. This study evaluated whether incorporating radiographic and clinical joint-specific parameters improves machine learning (ML)-based risk adjustment and prediction of postoperative complications and residual pain following TKA.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 1207 primary TKA procedures conducted at a single academic centre between 2018 and 2022. Three outcomes at 1 year were analysed: residual pain (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] ≥ 4), any complications and major complications. Predictor variables included patient-related factors (e.g., age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, comorbidities) and joint-specific parameters (e.g., limb alignment, range of motion) derived from preoperative radiographs and clinical assessment. Binary classification models were developed using a stacked gradient-boosting ensemble combining XGBoost and CatBoost. For each outcome, models using patient-specific variables alone were compared with models incorporating both patient- and joint-specific variables. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsIncorporating joint-specific parameters significantly improved prediction of complications. For major complications, the combined model achieved an AUC of 0.74 compared with 0.66 using patient variables alone. For any complications, the AUC increased from 0.64 to 0.72. No improvement was observed for predicting residual pain. The most influential joint-specific predictors included prior septic surgery, large bone defects, Kellgren-Lawrence Grade < 3, prior ligament reconstruction and preoperative knee flexion < 70°.
conclusionInclusion of joint-specific features improved ML-based prediction of postoperative complications following TKA, but did not improve prediction of residual pain. These findings suggest that joint-specific parameters may enhance risk adjustment for postoperative complications in TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.