ArticleJournal of marital and family therapy2026
RETRACTION: Superwoman Schema and Relationship Satisfaction Among Black Women in the United States: The Mediating Role of Relationship Attachment.
Article in Journal of marital and family therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
retractionS. Thorpe, K. E. Vigil, B. Duroseau, P. Iyiewuare, N. Malone, J. N. Dogan-Dixon, J. Ross, "Superwoman Schema and Relationship Satisfaction Among Black Women in the United States: The Mediating Role of Relationship Attachment," Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 51, no. 3 (2025): e70036, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmft.70036. The above article, published online on 27 May 2025 on Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) has been retracted by agreement between the Editor-in-Chief, Lenore M. McWey, the American Association of Marriage and Family Therapy, the authors, and Wiley Periodicals LLC. A third party reported that a number of references in this article were either incorrect or nonexistent. Further investigation confirmed that a significant number of references were either incorrect or nonexistent. All parties have determined that the large number of incorrect references constitutes a major error and leaves significant portions of the article unsubstantiated. This retraction has been agreed to because these errors in the references fundamentally compromise the content of the article.
Identifiers
42294523What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.