ArticleJournal of health economics and outcomes research2026
The Clinical and Economic Value of Incorporating Monocyte Distribution Width Testing in the Detection of Occult Sepsis.
Article in Journal of health economics and outcomes research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity, mortality, and increased healthcare costs. Early recognition is critical, yet occult sepsis often evades standard screening, delaying care and worsening outcomes. Monocyte distribution width (MDW), a novel blood biomarker automatically reported with a routine complete blood cell count (CBC), has emerged as a promising tool for early detection of occult sepsis in adult patients in the emergency department (ED). Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and economic impact of incorporating MDW into standard ED sepsis screening vs standard of care (SoC). Methods: This study utilized a cost-consequence model to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of incorporating MDW into standard ED sepsis screening compared with standard screening (SoC) alone. Adults presenting to the ED and meeting sepsis criteria within 24 hours of CBC collection were stratified by sepsis suspicion level (no, low, high) and MDW values (normal, elevated). Outcomes, including time-to-antibiotics, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), ICU admission, mortality, and readmissions, were estimated using trial data and regression models from published literature. Costs were assessed from a US provider perspective in 2024 US dollars. Results: In the base case, SoC + MDW testing was associated with lower costs per patient than SoC ( Conclusions: MDW was found to be a low-cost tool that can strengthen sepsis screening by flagging cases earlier, especially in occult sepsis. Because it is reported with a routine CBC, MDW can be readily implemented and may improve outcomes while reducing costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.