Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42294487›Full record

ArticleJournal of health economics and outcomes research2026

A Cost-per-Responder Analysis of Ritlecitinib vs Baricitinib in Severe Alopecia Areata.

Ashley S Cha-Silva, Kate H Zhang, Christopher N Graham, Samantha K Kurosky, Helen Tran, Ernest H Law, Eingun J Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health economics and outcomes research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashley S Cha-SilvaPfizer, Inc., New York, New York.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8484-6251
Kate H ZhangRTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Christopher N GrahamRTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Samantha K KuroskyPfizer, Inc., New York, New York.
Helen TranPfizer, Inc., New York, New York.
Ernest H LawPfizer, Inc., New York, New York.
Eingun J SongFrontier Dermatology, Mill Creek, Washington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ritlecitinib, a JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, and baricitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, are approved for treating severe alopecia areata (AA). Objective: Develop a cost-per-responder analysis for ritlecitinib and baricitinib for treating severe AA to estimate the budget impact based on clinical efficacy, available dosages, and pricing structure. Methods: A decision tree evaluated cost implications of once-daily ritlecitinib 50 mg, or baricitinib 2 mg and 4 mg treatment over 1 year from a US perspective. Drug costs were estimated using wholesale acquisition costs. Distribution across treatment and dosing options were based on real-world evidence. We defined shorter-term response as Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score relative change from baseline ≥30% (SALT Δ≥30%; SALT Results: At Week 24, 52.10% of ritlecitinib initiators and 36.28% of baricitinib initiators achieved SALT Δ ≥30%; at Week 52, 40.26% and 30.63% of ritlecitinib and baricitinib initiators, respectively, achieved SALT ≤20. Baricitinib had a higher cost per responder than ritlecitinib at Weeks 24 ( Conclusions: Ritlecitinib 50 mg demonstrated a lower cost per responder than baricitinib 2 or 4 mg at Weeks 24 and 52, which may inform reimbursement or formulary inclusion of ritlecitinib for treating AA.

Indexed as

alopecia areatabaricitinibcost-per-responderritlecitinibtreatment costs

Identifiers

PMID42294487
PMCPMC13264044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.