Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42294486›Full record

ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2026

3D brain tumor segmentation using an improved V-Net architecture and 3D attention gate.

Sima Esmaeilzadeh Asl, Mehdi Chehel Amirani, Hadi Seyedarabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sima Esmaeilzadeh AslDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Mehdi Chehel AmiraniDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Hadi SeyedarabiFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor segmentation involves the identification and definition of tumors in medical images, which is crucial for cancer diagnosis and treatment as it enables accurate measurement of the size and shape of the tumor. This can be done manually or automatically with computer algorithms. Automated segmentation reduces the time and effort of manual methods while enhancing accuracy and stability. This article uses BraTS2021 data for 3D brain tumor segmentation. Initially, an N4 BiasField Correction Filter preprocesses MRI data. An improved V-Net is used for segmenting enhanced tumors, whole tumors, and tumor cores. The V-Net processes image data in three dimensions, with enhancements in the decoder and encoder sections, improving overall performance. The encoder benefits from residual and dilated convolution layer, while the Attention Gate enhances the decoder. In the encoder, the dilated convolution layer enhances performance, while residual layers ensure that adding more layers doesn't harm the network. All four MRI types are input into the 3D improved V-Net, achieving Dice coefficients of 87%, 81.2%, and 74.43% for whole tumors, tumor cores, and enhanced tumors respectively. Results indicate this method effectively segments 3D brain MRI images.

Indexed as

3D brain MRIAttention gateDeep learningTumor segmentationV-net

Identifiers

PMID42294486
PMCPMC13260201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.