ArticleJournal of chemical education2026
Science Outreach: Providing an Authentic Independent Research Opportunity in Materials Science to School Students.
Article in Journal of chemical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Through the emerging field of bio-nanotechnology, students from UK high schools were provided with an opportunity to explore the use of DNA as a self-assembly building material to create unique DNA origami designs and evaluate these using web-based software. The project helped widen awareness of the cutting-edge research within materials science, enabled the participants to work with a high degree of independence, and reinforced the practical techniques required to synthesize a predesigned origami structure at school. This article describes the results of a study of this long-term, student-led independent research project. We collected data from 51 young people aged 16-19 engaged in the project using group interviews and found authentic research experiences can foster greater personal autonomy, sustain engagement, and be used to improve the perception of subjects such as materials science. The project also gave participants a greater understanding of the broader scene relating to careers within STEM and research as well as improved research skills through thinking and acting like a researcher.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.