ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Case Report: Unexpected LAMS obstruction following successful EUS-BD in a patient with pancreatic carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has become an established alternative for managing malignant biliary obstruction. While recurrent biliary obstruction-commonly due to tumor ingrowth or stent migration following EUS-BD-remains a major clinical challenge, food impaction within lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) has been rarely reported. Case presentation: A 75-year-old man with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma and duodenal invasion, who had undergone successful EUS-BD with LAMS placement 8 months previously, presented with recurrent obstructive jaundice. Initial imaging indicated no significant tumor progression compared with a follow-up CT performed three months earlier. No tumor ingrowth, overgrowth, or sludge accumulation was observed. Subsequent endoscopy revealed that the LAMS was occluded by food debris. Following endoscopic removal of the impacted food, purulent bile overflowed and a coaxial double-pigtail plastic stent was placed through the LAMS to maintain luminal patency. The patient recovered promptly. In retrospect, the patient reported no dietary restrictions since the previous EUS-BD. At 1-month follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic, without recurrent jaundice or need for reintervention. Conclusion: This case highlights food impaction as an unusual but clinically significant cause of recurrent obstructive jaundice following EUS-BD with LAMS. Successful management with endoscopic debridement and coaxial plastic stent placement offers a potential endoscopic strategy for this subgroup of patients. Moreover, this case emphasizes the importance of long-term dietary counseling in patients with indwelling LAMS to prevent this rare but potentially severe complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.