ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Posterior nasal hemorrhage mimicking intra-abdominal hemorrhage after gastrectomy: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative hemorrhage is a serious complication following gastrectomy, most commonly resulting from anastomotic bleeding or pseudoaneurysm rupture. When conventional diagnostic modalities fail to identify the source of bleeding, establishing an accurate diagnosis can be extremely challenging. Case presentation: We report the case of a 77-year-old Asian woman diagnosed with gastric malignancy who underwent Roux-en-Y total gastrectomy in our department. On postoperative day 6, she developed an esophagojejunal anastomotic leak. On postoperative day 28, the patient experienced hemorrhage, with bright red blood draining from the abdominal drain, mimicking delayed extra-intestinal bleeding. However, abdominal computed tomography (CT), endoscopy, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) revealed no evidence of intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Endoscopic evaluation further demonstrated that the abdominal drain had migrated into the jejunal lumen through the anastomotic leak. Ultimately, nasendoscopy identified the true source of bleeding: the posterior nasal cavity. Blood from this site entered the digestive tract via the pharynx and was externally drained through the displaced abdominal drain. Hemostasis was successfully achieved using endoscopic electrocautery. Conclusion: In cases of post-gastrectomy hemorrhage where contrast-enhanced CT, endoscopy, and DSA fail to localize the bleeding source, clinicians should actively investigate for remote or occult bleeding sites and consider atypical drainage pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.