ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Artificial intelligence electrocardiography for left ventricular systolic dysfunction demonstrates preserved performance across demographic training imbalances.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled electrocardiograms (AI-ECG) can detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), but demographic imbalance in training datasets may introduce bias. Foundational models, pretrained on large and diverse datasets, may mitigate such concerns. We aimed to assess the impact of demographic composition in training datasets on the performance of an ECG Foundational Model (ECGFM) for diagnosing LVSD. Methods and results: We developed an ECG foundational model (ECGFM) using transformer architecture and self-supervised pretraining on 983 200 ECGs. Using 44 815 paired ECG-echocardiogram datasets, we trained the model under three biased scenarios: (1) sex-skewed (male-only or female-only), (2) race-skewed (White-only or non-White), and (3) balanced. Models were evaluated on a test cohort consisting of 4663 male patients (52%) and 4300 female patients (48%) for the sex configuration and 4440 (49.5%) White, 558 (6.2%) Black, 925 Asian (10.3%), and 3040 other (33.9%) patients, for the race-based configuration using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The ECGFM demonstrated consistent performance across all demographic configurations. Training on male-only or female-only cohorts yielded comparable AUROC scores of 0.85-0.90 for both sexes in the test set in predicting LVSD. Similarly, training on White-only or non-White cohorts resulted in robust AUROC scores (≥0.90) across all racial groups, including Asian, Black, Hispanic/Latino, and American Indian/Native Alaskan subgroups. Balanced and imbalanced training produced comparable accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The performance of the model was externally tested in EchoNext, revealing AUROC scores 0.823-0.917 for sex and 0.822-0.917 for race. Conclusion: Our transformer-based ECG foundational model pretrained using self-supervised learning demonstrated preserved diagnostic accuracy for LVSD across diverse demographic groups, even when trained on demographically imbalanced datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.