ReviewJournal of pain research2026
Acupuncture-Related Interventions for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic prostatitis (CP) is a common condition for which pharmacological therapies often provide unsatisfactory outcomes. Acupuncture has emerged as a promising supportive therapy. However, further comparative studies are needed to clarify the relative effectiveness of different acupuncture modalities versus standard pharmacological therapies, particularly because most existing trials used active rather than sham-controlled comparisons. Methods: This network meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420251180258) evaluated acupuncture-related therapies for CP. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through October 2025 were identified. The primary outcome was the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). Analyses were conducted using Stata 17.0, with mean differences (MDs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and SUCRA rankings calculated. Most included studies compared acupuncture-related therapies with pharmacological treatments rather than sham controls. Results: Forty-five RCTs involving 3534 participants were included. Acupuncture-related therapies, alone or combined with medication, were associated with greater improvements in NIH-CPSI outcomes than conventional medications in active-controlled trials. Warm needle acupuncture (WMA) ranked highest for total NIH-CPSI improvement (SUCRA 94.1%) and response rate (RR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.20-1.51; SUCRA 91.4%). Electroacupuncture (EA) demonstrated favorable effects across multiple outcomes, ranking second for total NIH-CPSI improvement (SUCRA 86.2%) and showing benefits in pain relief and quality of life. EA combined with Western medicine ranked highest for pain relief, while auricular acupoint therapy showed advantages for urinary symptoms. Manual acupuncture combined with Chinese herbal medicine ranked highest for quality-of-life improvement. Conclusion: Acupuncture-related therapies may serve as useful complementary approaches for improving CP symptoms in active-controlled trials. WMA showed the greatest overall improvement and response rates, whereas EA and EA combined with Western medicine demonstrated benefits across multiple symptom domains. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously because most studies were conducted in Chinese populations, evidence certainty was predominantly low to moderate, and long-term follow-up data were limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.