ArticleJournal of public health research2026
Exploring caseworkers' experiences of SMILE: Facilitating sustainable employment for people with complex needs.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Research suggests that holistic, person-centred support may be effective in facilitating employment for people with complex needs. A model based on such principles, labelled SMILE, was developed for this purpose. This study aimed to explore caseworkers' experiences using SMILE, to identify which aspects they perceive as key to helping people with complex needs achieve sustainable employment. Design and methods: The study employed a qualitative approach, using semi-structured interviews with 13 caseworkers who had first-hand experience working with the model to enhance employability among people with complex needs. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: The respondents emphasised the model's holistic, person-centred support as essential for enabling targeted and relevant interventions. They also stressed the importance of clients having access to all interventions through a single point of entry. They also highlighted that progress served to energise and motivate clients. Another key aspect was ensuring the availability of continuous and easily accessible support from caseworkers, providing a sense of security for clients. This allowed them to make progress, cultivating empowerment and leading to a sense of self-efficacy and belief in their ability to attain sustainable employment. Conclusions: Key aspects of the model that facilitated employment for people with complex needs included: providing holistic, person-centred support accessible through a single access point. Continuous and easily accessible support from a consistent caseworker was also essential for facilitating steady progress and fostering a sense of self-worth and confidence in their ability to gain employment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.