ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Management of toxicities from antibody - drug conjugates in breast cancer.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have transformed breast-cancer therapeutics by combining targeted antibody delivery with potent cytotoxic payloads. With the expanding use of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), sacituzumab govitecan (SG), and datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) across HER2-positive, HER2-low, and hormone-receptor-positive disease, management of treatment-related toxicities has become a critical determinant of outcomes. Objective: To synthesize clinical-trial, post-marketing, and real-world data to create a unified, organ-system-based framework for anticipating, preventing, and managing toxicities associated with these ADCs. Methods: A targeted narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov (January 2019 - December 2025). Phase II/III trials, meta-analyses, pharmacovigilance studies, and expert-consensus guidelines on ADC safety in breast cancer were included. Pre-clinical and non-breast ADC studies were excluded. Results: Comparative synthesis demonstrates overlapping but distinct toxicity signatures driven by payload, linker stability, and antigen expression. Integrating these findings, we propose practical algorithms for managing pulmonary, gastrointestinal, hematologic, ocular, and mucosal adverse events. Conclusion: This review consolidates evidence into a clinician-oriented reference for ADC toxicity management, emphasizing multidisciplinary coordination, early recognition, and system-specific mitigation strategies to enhance treatment safety and adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.