Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42294311›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026

Environmental endocrine disruptors and endometrial cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cadmium and polychlorinated biphenyls, with emerging evidence on PFAS, phthalates, and bisphenols.

Lutian Gong, Wenping Lu, Yujing Zhao, Heting Mei, Xiangyang Zhang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lutian GongDepartment of Oncology, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guang'anmen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wenping LuDepartment of Oncology, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guang'anmen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yujing ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guang'anmen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Heting MeiDepartment of Oncology, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guang'anmen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiangyang ZhangDepartment of Oncology, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guang'anmen Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) have been implicated in hormone-related carcinogenesis, however, their associations with endometrial cancer risk remain unclear; therefore, this study aimed to systematically evaluate the relationship between multiple classes of EDCs and the endometrial cancer risk. Methods: The PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published up to November 30, 2025. Studies evaluating the association between EDCs exposure and endometrial cancer risk were included. When sufficient data were available, meta-analyses of cadmium and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were conducted using random-effects models, with subgroup and sensitivity analyses performed. Evidence on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), phthalates, and bisphenols was summarized through a structured narrative review. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 18.0. Results: A total of 14 studies were included. The meta-analysis showed that higher cadmium exposure was associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer (RR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01-1.47), with considerable heterogeneity across studies (I²= 72.17%). Subgroup analyses suggested that the association was not statistically significant for dietary cadmium exposure or among women undergoing hormone therapy, and a marginally positive association was observed in postmenopausal women (RR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.99-1.64). No significant association was identified between PCBs exposure and endometrial cancer risk (RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.79-1.56), and heterogeneity was low (I² = 0.0%). Findings from case-control studies and subgroup analyses stratified by PCBs functional classification (Estrogenic and Enzyme-inducing types) were consistent, with no significant associations detected. Owing to the limited number of available studies, quantitative synthesis was not feasible for PFAS, phthalates, or bisphenols. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests a potential link between cadmium exposure and endometrial cancer, though substantial heterogeneity warrants caution. No consistent association was observed for PCBs. Evidence on emerging EDCs, including PFAS, phthalates, and bisphenols, remains limited and exploratory. Well-designed prospective studies with improved exposure assessment and standardized confounder control are needed.

Indexed as

cadmiumendometrial cancerenvironmental endocrine-disrupting chemicalsmeta-analysisPCBssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42294311
PMCPMC13253379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.