Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42294301›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

A novel short-term outcome prediction model for esophagectomy patients receiving neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a muti-center retrospective study.

Qi-Hong Zhong, Ye-Qin Zhang, Jing-Yu Wu, Jiang-Shan Huang, Fei-Long Guo, Wen-Wei Lin, Sui Chen, Gang Wang, Zhen-Yang Zhang, Jiang-Bo Lin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Qi-Hong Zhong *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Ye-Qin Zhang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Jing-Yu Wu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Jiang-Shan HuangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Fei-Long GuoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Wen-Wei LinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Sui ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Gang WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Ganzhou Cancer Hospital, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China.
Zhen-Yang ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Jiang-Bo LinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Mao-Xiu YuanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jinggangshan University, Ji'an, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Due to the lack of a comprehensive evaluation of the short-term prognosis of patients undergoing radical resection of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy, recent clinical strategies have remained subjective and controversial. The recognition of pretreatment risk factors and tailored treatment could improve outcomes of esophagectomy patients. Therefore, we aimed to develop a predictive model that differentiates high-risk conditions after surgery in patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: We conducted a muti-center, retrospective cohort study in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Ganzhou Cancer Hospital and Affiliated Hospital of Jinggangshan University. A principal component (PC) analysis was applied for data simplification and the extraction of patient short-term outcome characteristic. We identified risk status on admission and operation, via a logistic regression and then constructed prediction models for worsened short-term outcomes. Results: Of 334 patients of train set underwent neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy, 142(42.5%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC), 192(57.5%) received neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NIC). After grouping by principal component analysis, patients were divided into high-risk group (83,25%) and low-risk group (251,75%). Twelve features regarding clinical feature, nutrition indicators, laboratory indicators and intraoperative data were identified. The prediction model showed the best performance in predicting high short-term outcome risk, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.794 (95%CI, 0.712,0.876) in NC, and 0.781 (95%CI, 0.705,0.858) in NIC. Conclusion: A novel short-term outcome prediction model, offers a comprehensive assessment of posttreatment recovery in esophagectomy patients after neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

esophageal canceresophagectomymulticenterneoadjuvant immunochemotherapyshort-term outcome

Identifiers

PMID42294301
PMCPMC13259800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.