ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Comparison of the diagnostic power of serum circulating miR-21, VEGF, and CA15-3 in breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical utility of serum circulating microRNA-21 (miR-21) in the early diagnosis of breast cancer (BC), and to compare its diagnostic performance with raditional serum biomarkers, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA15-3). Methods: From January 2023 to October 2025, a total of 106 women diagnosed with BC, 69 women with benign breast nodules, and 62 healthy women undergoing routine physical examinations were enrolled at a single institution. Serum levels of miR-21, VEGF, and CA15-3 were measured and compared across groups. Relationships between miR-21 and the traditional markers were analyzed using Spearman correlation analysis. Diagnostic efficacy was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Relative expression levels of serum miR-21, VEGF, and CA15-3 were significantly elevated in individuals with BC compared to healthy controls (all Conclusion: Serum circulating miR-21 demonstrated significantly elevated expression in patients with BC and presented superior sensitivity and specificity compared to VEGF and CA15-3. These findings highlight miR-21 as a promising non-invasive biomarker for early breast cancer detection, particularly in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies. However, limitations include a relatively small sample size and single-center design, necessitating validation in larger, multicenter prospective cohorts. Future studies should explore miR-21's association with molecular subtypes and clinical outcomes to facilitate clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.