ArticleACS omega2026
Enhancing Water Flooding Oil Recovery by Regulating Rock Surface Under-Oil-Water Wettability.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditionally, the efficiency of water flooding for oil recovery has been attributed to whether the formation is "water-wet" (hydrophilic) or "oil-wet" (oleophilic). However, water flooding is fundamentally a process in which the aqueous phase displaces the oil phase from the rock surface, involving the replacement of the "oil-rock" interface with a "water-rock" interface. This process is closely related to the under-oil-water wettability of the rock surface. In this study, alkoxysilane modification was used to regulate rock surfaces, achieving three wetting states: under-oil hydrophilic (under-oil-water contact angle of 34.9°), under-oil neutral (under-oil-water contact angle of 92.4°), and under-oil hydrophobic (under-oil-water contact angle of 129.2°). The simulated water flooding and spontaneous imbibition experiments demonstrate that enhancing the under-oil hydrophilicity of rock significantly improves both water flooding oil recovery and imbibition recovery. Water flooding results show that, compared to untreated natural cores, the oil recovery of under-oil hydrophilic cores increased by 10.5%, with a corresponding reduction in displacement pressure of 1.4 MPa. In contrast, under-oil hydrophobic cores exhibited a 13.7% decrease in recovery and a 1.3 MPa increase in pressure. Spontaneous imbibition tests revealed that under-oil hydrophilic cores achieved an imbibition recovery of 34.02%, whereas under-oil hydrophobic cores showed almost no effective oil production via imbibition. It also confirms that it is not the overall water or oil wettability (in air) of the rock surface but the under-oil-water wettability that determines the efficiency of water flooding. These findings can provide insightful guidance for searching for more efficient water flooding methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.