ReviewACS omega2026
Reassessment of Recycling Rates of Platinum Group Metals (PGMs) and Their Impact on Sustainability Models.
Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A reliable estimate of the impact of recycling is crucial for a fact-based assessment of the current and future sustainability of platinum group metal (PGM)-based catalysts. Recycling rates in the literature are usually calculated based on published market data, notably from Johnson Matthey, but as these reported data exclude "closed-loop" recycling, this method leads to a significant underestimation of recycling volumes. Harnessing Johnson Matthey's primary PGM market research and its proprietary suite of supply/demand/recycling models, we publish here an estimate of closed-loop recycling volumes. We find that closed-loop recycling volumes are much larger than open-loop recycling (which is reported in market data as secondary PGM supply) and that it is likely that between 50 and 60% of the metal used on new products is now sourced from recycling (globally on average). The significant reduction in global warming potential (GWP) of recycled (secondary) PGMs compared to newly mined (primary) metal means that an estimate of the proportion of recycled metal in a catalytic process or PGM-based product must be properly factored into LCA models. Our data and scenarios suggest that the GWP impact of PGMs can be reduced by 1 order of magnitude when a recycling "closed loop" is put in place within a process, underscoring the sustainability benefit of implementing routine recycling wherever practicable and ensuring that the recovered metal is retained.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.