ArticleACS omega2026
Degree-Based Topological Indices and Machine Learning for QSPR Modeling of Arthritis Drugs.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Machine Learning Approaches and Topological Indices for Prediction of Electronic Properties in Anticancer Drugs.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Eccentricity-based topological indices of QSPR modelling using anti-cancer drugs.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the challenge of accurately predicting the physicochemical properties of arthritis drugs using simple graph-theoretic descriptors and evaluates whether combining degree-based topological indices with modern machine learning can outperform traditional linear QSPR models. Nine classical degree-based topological indices (including reformulated Zagreb indices, augmented Zagreb index, hyper-Zagreb index, forgotten index, symmetric division degree index, and inverse sum Zagreb index) were computed for 50 structurally diverse arthritis drugs ranging from NSAIDs (ibuprofen and diclofenac) and COX-2 inhibitors (celecoxib) to disease-modifying agents (methotrexate) and immunomodulators with experimental property values (boiling point, melting point, critical pressure, molar refractivity, topological polar surface area, and calculated LogP) obtained from ChemDraw and PubChem. Using these indices as input features, linear regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost models were developed and compared. XGBoost consistently outperformed the other methods across all properties, achieving for molar refractivity a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.80787, a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1.13352, and coefficient of determination (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.