Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42294187›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Machine Learning-Driven Drug Repurposing for KRAS G12C and KRAS G12D Inhibition.

Gianluca Fuschi, Julia St Germain, David Bebensee, Christophe Moawad, Arina Aladysheva, Ashraf Mohamed, Bernard R Brooks, Rajkumar Savai, Eiman Elwakeel, Muhamed Amin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gianluca FuschiDepartment of Sciences, University College Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9718 BG, The Netherlands.
Julia St GermainDepartment of Sciences, University College Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9718 BG, The Netherlands.
David BebenseeDepartment of Sciences, University College Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9718 BG, The Netherlands.
Christophe MoawadDepartment of Sciences, University College Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9718 BG, The Netherlands.
Arina AladyshevaDepartment of Sciences, University College Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9718 BG, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6310-2964
Ashraf MohamedDepartment of Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6753-7254
Bernard R BrooksLaboratory of Computational Biology, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3586-2730
Rajkumar SavaiMax Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim 61231, Germany.
Eiman ElwakeelMax Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim 61231, Germany.
Muhamed AminDepartment of Sciences, University College Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9718 BG, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3146-150X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

KRAS is a predominant oncogenic driver across multiple cancers and was long considered undruggable due to its high nucleotide affinity and lack of classical binding pockets. Although recent advances have led to covalent inhibitors such as Sotorasib and Adagrasib for the KRAS G12C mutation, effective therapies for other common variants, particularly KRAS G12D, which is highly prevalent in aggressive pancreatic cancers, remain limited. In this study, we employed machine learning approaches to identify potential inhibitors of KRAS G12D and G12C by screening FDA-approved compounds curated from the ChEMBL database. Random Forest and Neural Network models were trained on bioactivity data from three BindingDB data sets: wild-type KRAS GTPase, KRAS G12C, and KRAS G12D. The trained models demonstrated strong predictive performance, achieving high correlation coefficients on independent test sets. To further validate the predictive capability of the models, two compounds identified as high-confidence candidates, Cobimetinib and Etrasimod, were selected for experimental evaluation. In vitro testing revealed measurable IC

Identifiers

PMID42294187
PMCPMC13261579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.