Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42294150›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Robust and Democratic s‑SNOM Data Analysis and Modeling in Quasar.

Gergely Németh, Marko Toplak, Stuart Read, Raul de Oliveira Freitas, Ferenc Borondics

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gergely NémethSOLEIL Synchrotron, L'Orme des Merisiers, RD128, Saint Aubin 91190, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1590-2133
Marko ToplakFaculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Stuart ReadCanadian Light Source, Inc., 44 Innovation Boulevard, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 2 V3, Canada.
Raul de Oliveira FreitasBrazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory, Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials, Campinas, SP 13083-970, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3285-5447
Ferenc BorondicsSOLEIL Synchrotron, L'Orme des Merisiers, RD128, Saint Aubin 91190, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9975-4301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Near-field optics is a blooming field of physics with multiple techniques that contribute to help understand novel and complex optical phenomena. Among them, scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM) is a well-established method, which was largely enabled by the advent of high-brightness tunable or broadband infrared sources. Thus, today, besides imaging, spectroscopy, and hyperspectral measurements are easily available at the nanoscale. Such instrumental capabilities and the commercialization of s-SNOM instruments made experiments on low-energy phenomena accessible to a large number of laboratories. However, an important outstanding issue is the lack of data analysis tools. Underlying phenomena are complex and require flexible, experiment-specific workflows, numerical modeling, or the use of artificial intelligence. While expert research groups develop specific, in-house processing codes, adapting, exchanging, and reproducing data analysis workflows even within those laboratories can be challenging. Therefore, the need for software that allows easy data processing and interpretation is clear. Here, we introduce the first open-source software suite based on visual programming that democratizes s-SNOM data analysis, unlocks the potential of machine learning for newcomers to the field, and empowers experts to develop and collaborate more efficiently, benefiting the whole near-field community.

Identifiers

PMID42294150
PMCPMC13261438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.