ArticleACS omega2026
Robust and Democratic s‑SNOM Data Analysis and Modeling in Quasar.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Near-field optics is a blooming field of physics with multiple techniques that contribute to help understand novel and complex optical phenomena. Among them, scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM) is a well-established method, which was largely enabled by the advent of high-brightness tunable or broadband infrared sources. Thus, today, besides imaging, spectroscopy, and hyperspectral measurements are easily available at the nanoscale. Such instrumental capabilities and the commercialization of s-SNOM instruments made experiments on low-energy phenomena accessible to a large number of laboratories. However, an important outstanding issue is the lack of data analysis tools. Underlying phenomena are complex and require flexible, experiment-specific workflows, numerical modeling, or the use of artificial intelligence. While expert research groups develop specific, in-house processing codes, adapting, exchanging, and reproducing data analysis workflows even within those laboratories can be challenging. Therefore, the need for software that allows easy data processing and interpretation is clear. Here, we introduce the first open-source software suite based on visual programming that democratizes s-SNOM data analysis, unlocks the potential of machine learning for newcomers to the field, and empowers experts to develop and collaborate more efficiently, benefiting the whole near-field community.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.