Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42294092›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2026

Seeking global agreement on controlled donation after circulatory determination of death: methodology and definitions of the Bucharest international European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) consensus.

Dominique E Martin, Umberto Cillo, Marius Berman, Alexandra K Glazier, Eduardo Miñambres, Helen Opdam, Alicia Pérez-Blanco, Francesco Procaccio, Marion Siebelink, Matthew J Weiss and 2 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Potential for donation after circulatory death in Germany: a multicenter retrospective study at seven university hospitals.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dominique E MartinFaculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Umberto CilloUnità di Chirurgia Epatobiliare e Trapianto Epatico, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Marius BermanRoyal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Alexandra K GlazierNew England Donor Services, Waltham, MA, United States.
Eduardo MiñambresTransplant Coordination Unit and Service of Intensive Care, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.
Helen OpdamAustin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Alicia Pérez-BlancoOrganizacion Nacional de Trasplantes, Madrid, Spain.
Francesco ProcaccioFondazione Trapianti Onlus, Milan, Italy.
Marion SiebelinkUniversitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, UMCG Transplantatiecentrum, Groningen, Netherlands.
Matthew J WeissTransplant Quebec, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Beatriz Domínguez-GilOrganizacion Nacional de Trasplantes, Madrid, Spain.
Gabriel C OniscuDivision of Transplantation Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (cDCDD) is now a major contributor to transplant activity worldwide. However, its expansion has been complicated by inconsistent terminology, diverse clinical protocols, and ethical uncertainties. To address these challenges, the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a global consensus forum involving multidisciplinary experts from various geographic regions. Four steering committees were established to address adult and pediatric donation pathways, normothermic regional perfusion, and the determination of death. Using a structured methodology, expert panels participated in two waves of surveys, complemented by an in-person consensus meeting to develop recommendations on key clinical and ethical aspects of cDCDD. This article presents the project methodology and consensus results regarding standardized terminology and definitions that are essential for successfully harmonizing international practice. Consensus was achieved on fundamental terms, including the recommended nomenclature of "donation after circulatory determination of death," definitions of clinical categories such as possible and potential donors, and key time points in donation protocols. The establishment of shared terminology provides a foundation for comparing outcomes across programs, facilitating international research collaboration, and supporting evidence-based improvements in clinical practice. This consensus represents an important step toward global convergence of donation practices while maintaining core ethical values and supporting continued technological and societal progress in the field.

Indexed as

DeathOrgan TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementAdultBrain DeathChildEuropeHumansInternational CooperationSocieties, MedicalTerminology as TopicTissue Donorsconsensuscontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death (cDCDD)ethicsorgan donationtransplantation

Identifiers

PMID42294092
PMCPMC13254459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.