ArticleBrain, behavior, & immunity - health2026
Inflammation, fronto-amygdala connectivity, and negative affective reactivity to daily stress in adolescents.
Article in Brain, behavior, & immunity - health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Maladaptive affective responses to daily stress in adolescence are a robust risk factor for the development of psychopathology. Importantly, however, adolescents vary widely in the magnitude of their affective reactivity to stress. Although peripheral inflammation and fronto-amygdala circuitry during emotion regulation are both plausible biological contributors to this variability, no study has yet integrated inflammatory markers, neural metrics of emotion regulation, and real-world assessments of stress and affect to examine how these systems interact to shape affective reactivity to stress in adolescents' daily life. Methods: Adolescents (N = 124; 60% female) aged 13.07-20.10 years (M = 16.20) completed a 14-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol assessing stressor occurrence, stress severity, and momentary affect. A subset of participants provided peripheral blood samples assayed for C-reactive protein (CRP) to index systemic inflammation (N = 85), and a further subset completed an fMRI affect-labeling task to quantify task-related functional connectivity between the amygdala and lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC; N = 68). Multilevel models tested whether higher CRP predicted stronger within-person coupling of stress and negative affect (NA), and whether LPFC-amygdala connectivity moderated this association. Results: Higher stress severity predicted higher NA, and greater inflammation potentiated these stress-related increases in NA. A three-way interaction with DLPFC-amygdala connectivity may further moderate this association, but the effect did not survive correction for multiple comparisons, and the sample was underpowered to test it reliably. Conclusions: Inflammation was linked to stronger coupling of daily stress and negative affect in adolescents. Whether fronto-amygdala connectivity adds to this remains untested at adequate power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.