Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42294060›Full record

ArticleOpen research Europe2026

Detection, identification and quantification of NGTs in EU authorization procedures - No solution without legislative change.

Kai Purnhagen, Detlef Bartsch, Kolja Eckermann, Aleksandra Hubar-Kołodziejczyk, Jörn Lämke, Steffen Pallarz, Justus Wesseler

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Open research Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kai PurnhagenUniversity of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany.
Detlef BartschInstitute of Veterinary Biochemistry, University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2961-915X
Kolja EckermannBundesamt fur Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit Berlin Mitte, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Aleksandra Hubar-KołodziejczykUniversity of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany.
Jörn LämkeBundesamt fur Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit Berlin Mitte, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Steffen PallarzBundesamt fur Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit Berlin Mitte, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Justus WesselerWageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6009-8543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the purposes of GMO authorisation, applicants are required to submit validated methods for the detection, identification and quantification (DIQ). For classical transgenic organisms, this requirement has proven workable. For products derived from New Genomic Techniques (NGTs), specifically those introducing small insertions and deletions (InDels) without foreign genetic material, it has not. NGT-induced genomic changes are frequently indistinguishable from naturally occurring mutations, making identification legally required but technically unachievable with currently available analytical tools. This open letter examines whether recently proposed DIQ methodologies, including genomic fingerprinting approaches based on single nucleotide variant (SNV) profiling, can bridge this gap. We find that while such approaches advance detection capabilities, they fall short of the identification and quantification standards demanded by EU law, for reasons such as the absence of universal pangenome datasets, the complexity of polyploid crop genomes, the loss of fingerprint integrity through elite line crossing, and the dependence of recombination rates on multiple species-specific factors. The mismatch between legal requirements and scientific feasibility has consequences for authorisation procedures, supply chain compliance, organic farming integrity, and international trade. We conclude that no purely technical solution is forthcoming and that legislative change is necessary. Aligning the EU's evidentiary standards with technical reality is a precondition for a functional and enforceable GMO authorisation system.

Indexed as

Detectiongenome editingIdentification and Quantification (DIQ)New Genomic Techniques (NGTs)single nucleotide variants (SNVs)

Identifiers

PMID42294060
PMCPMC13261188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.