ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Text-guided few-shot liver and tumor segmentation.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: High-precision liver and tumor segmentation is a cornerstone of digital oncology, yet its clinical deployment remains constrained by two persistent challenges: the scarcity of pixel-level annotations and severe performance degradation under cross-center domain shift. Although few shot learning offers a promising direction for data-efficient modeling, existing approaches relying solely on visual similarity often fail to generalize across heterogeneous clinical environments. Method: In this study, we propose a text-guided few-shot segmentation framework that integrates clinical semantic information as an explicit inductive bias to bridge the gap between low-level pixels and high-level diagnostic reasoning. The framework consists of three synergistic modules: an Automated Semantic Generator that employs a large-scale vision-language model to encode clinically structured semantic descriptions into structured linguistic priors. A Text-Guided Gating (TGG) mechanism that adaptively modulates visual representations to filter scanner-dependent artifacts, and a Decoupled Prototype Learner that constructs unbiased class prototypes via per-image averaging and gradient detachment to address extreme class imbalance. Together, these components transform segmentation from a pure visual matching task into a knowledge guided reasoning process, ensuring both data efficiency and improved cross-dataset robustness across heterogeneous datasets. Results: Experiments on LiTS and 3DIRCADb show that the method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art supervised, foundation-model-based, and few-shot baselines. On 3DIRCADb, compared to PANet, the strongest few-shot baseline, our method improves external liver Dice by 8.7 percentage points and external tumor Dice by 26.3 percentage points, effectively mitigating performance degradation in conventional supervised models. Discussion: These results demonstrate that cross-modal semantic guidance enhances robust medical image segmentation under domain shift.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.