ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Resources consumption and environmental impacts of the DYNAMIC digital health intervention aimed at improving quality of care for sick children in Tanzania: a life cycle assessment.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Health systems contribute to an important part of planetary boundaries overshoot, the effect of its rapid digitalization being however not well known. DYNAMIC is a Tanzanian digital health project, aimed at improving quality of care for sick children at primary care level through the provision of a tablet-based clinical decision support algorithm for clinicians. We evaluated the raw material resources and energy required by this intervention, as well as the environmental impacts, to inform strategies for improving its sustainability. Methods: Additional resources, including IT equipment, diagnostics and medicines used by the health intervention compared to usual care, were quantified. A life cycle assessment was conducted to calculate greenhouse gas emissions, fossil energy and mineral resources use, and damages to ecosystems and human health. Findings: GHG emissions of the intervention in 40 health facilities over one year, allowing to attend 90,992 children, were 20.6 tons of CO2-eq per year (PY). Medical supplies were the main source of emissions (13 tons), followed by digital supplies (5 tons), and logistics (2.6 tons). Fossil energy and mineral resources used were 380 GigaJoules and 77.9 kg deprived PY respectively. Damage on human health was 0.062 DALY, and on ecosystems 12,385 Potentially Disappeared Fraction of Species per m Interpretation: The digital component of the DYNAMIC health intervention increased its carbon footprint by a third, the main drivers remaining however the increase in medicines and medical devices use. Three quarters of the overall emissions could however be saved thanks to the antibiotic stewardship effect of the intervention. This shows that the rapid digitalization of health systems could accelerate their dependency on fossil fuels and other raw material. This negative effect on the environmental should be systematically evaluated to know if it is at least compensated by a benefit in terms of medical supplies savings. Promoting local, eco-friendly production of essential medical supplies and synergizing digital health interventions to use a shared IT infrastructure are also essential strategies for preserving resources and protecting the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.