Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42294040›Full record

ArticleACS polymers Au2026

Potentials of Machine Learning in Predicting Key Features of Synthetic Antimicrobial Polymers.

Lena Dalal, Deborah Barker, Nicholas J Warren, Olivier J Cayre, Sebastien Perrier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS polymers Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lena DalalDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6483-8900
Deborah BarkerDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5470-7359
Nicholas J WarrenDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8298-1417
Olivier J CayreDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1339-3686
Sebastien PerrierDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5055-9046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the global rise in antimicrobial resistance calls for new therapeutic strategies, synthetic antimicrobial polymers (SAMPs) have emerged as promising alternatives to host-defense peptides, offering tunable structures and reduced limitations. In this work, we employed machine learning (ML) approaches to elucidate the structure-activity relationships of a library of polyacrylamides systematically varied in (1) amine side-chain chemistry, (2) chain length, (3) cationic amine ratio, and (4) polymer architecture. The library consisted of 23 different polymer designs, 3 of which exhibited low minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) against different bacterial strains, and 5 of which caused low red blood cells agglutination. Among the evaluated ML algorithms, regression random forest and gradient boosting regression consistently reproduced feature importance and maintained stable decision-tree structures, with gradient boosting outperforming random forest in predictive power. Gradient boosting achieved RSME values of 20, 6, 13 and 12 μg/ml, respectively, for each modelled MIC of 4 bacterial strains:

Indexed as

antimicrobial polymersgradient boostingmachine learningRAFTrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID42294040
PMCPMC13261730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.