ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026
Optimizing wild bird fecal surveillance sites for HPAI through risk estimation using machine learning algorithms.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wild birds are major reservoirs contributing to the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI). Accordingly, fecal-based surveillance of wild birds has been implemented as an early warning system for poultry in South Korea. However, the efficiency of the current system remains limited due to the absence of a quantitative basis. This study aimed to develop a risk-based strategy for optimizing fecal sampling sites, thereby strengthening early warning capacity and preventing the introduction of HPAI into poultry farms. Methods: The study area comprised 110 designated surveillance areas divided into 1-km edge hexagonal grids. The study period covered October to February from 2021 to 2024. For each grid, we integrated wild bird fecal sampling data with various categories of factors. The dependent variable was the detection of avian influenza virus (AIV) in wild bird feces, while all other variables served as predictors. The risk of AIV detection was estimated using machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, gradient boosting machine, extreme gradient boosting, and an ensemble model. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Results: The ensemble model achieved the best predictive performance. Climatic factors, sample size, population, and elevation were identified as the most influential predictors. Spatial inconsistency was observed between the current sampling sites and the proposed risk-based sampling sites. Conclusions: The proposed risk-based framework enables prioritization of sampling sites, thereby optimizing fecal-based surveillance for HPAI. This approach is expected to enhance the efficiency of EWS and contribute to the prevention of HPAI spread to poultry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.