ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2026
Out with the new, in with the old: how traditional masculine norms are constructed, communicated, and contested within an all-boys' school community.
Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Previous research has explored adolescent boys' masculinity attitudes and the social forces shaping them. We extend this work by examining masculinity attitudes of all students, parents, and staff of a relatively affluent, independent faith-based all-boys' school in metropolitan Australia. Method: A qualitative Reflexive Thematic Analysis of open-text questions, distributed in an online survey to 650 students, 287 parents, and 46 staff, examined beliefs about masculinity, desired masculine ideals, contextual differences (home vs. school), and behavioural consequences. Results: Boys' accounts revealed context-dependent constructions of masculinity, with pro-social norms more salient at home and dominance-oriented norms enforced in school settings. They framed traditional masculinity as developmentally necessary, reinforced by manosphere narratives and fuelled by counter-cultural resistance to progressive change. Despite this, many boys recognised the personal and social costs of these norms, and there was substantial divergence between boys' views and those of parents and school staff. Conclusions: Results highlight the influential role of peer/school contexts and online manosphere narratives in shaping Australian boys' masculinity attitudes, as well as clear generational differences in how masculine status was defined. These findings point to schools as key leverage points for interventions aimed at promoting healthier, context-sensitive models of masculinity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.