SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Psychosocial responses to outdoor artificial light at night (ALAN): a scoping review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Artificial light at night (ALAN) has sharply increased due to urbanization and expanded nighttime activities. Given its ecological, health, and energy impacts, several countries and cities have begun implementing lighting reductions. Understanding the psychosocial processes and determinants shaping individuals' responses to ALAN is essential for policy acceptance and effectiveness. The objective of this review is to map and synthesize the scientific literature on psychosocial processes and determinants underlying responses to outdoor ALAN, drawing on concepts from environmental psychology. Method: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, 75 ( Results: Four main findings emerged from this review: (1) ALAN research is recent and concentrated in a few countries, (2) studies mainly use quantitative and cross-sectional designs, but varied measures limit comparability, (3) perceptual and emotional responses dominate the literature, while cognitive, motivational, and behavioral dimensions are less studied, and (4) theoretical frameworks, particularly in environmental psychology, are rarely used. Discussion: Research on psychosocial responses associated with ALAN is dominated by perceptual and emotional approaches, while key psychosocial processes and determinants (e.g., norms, values, and constraints), central to environmental psychology frameworks, remain underexplored. Future work should adopt environmental psychology models to examine how beliefs, emotions, and routines shape individuals' responses to ALAN and inform acceptable lighting policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.