Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42293938›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Hearing objects move: apparent motion in complex sounds.

Meike C Kriegeskorte, Bettina Rolke, Elisabeth Hein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meike C KriegeskorteDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Bettina RolkeDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Elisabeth HeinDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How can we perceive objects as moving based on auditory information? This information is often not continuous, such as when objects are temporarily masked by other, louder objects. To perceive these auditory objects as moving along a continuous path, rather than as one object disappearing and another one reappearing, we need to establish correspondence between the correct object instances, resulting in an auditory apparent motion percept of only one object moving across space. However, correctly linking the object instances that belong to the same object is challenging, as auditory input is often ambiguous, such as when several objects follow overlapping trajectories. Previous studies with visual objects have shown that correspondence is influenced by spatiotemporal factors and object features, such as the color, size or shape. Recent studies have shown that correspondence in the auditory modality also depends on spatiotemporal and even feature information, i.e., the frequency of simple sinewave tones. This study aimed to determine whether this finding generalizes to more complex sounds that are meaningful to us and which may involve higher levels of processing. To test this idea, we created an ambiguous apparent motion display biased with sounds from two different musical instruments, a piano and a guitar. Additionally, we manipulated spatiotemporal information. Our results demonstrate that the auditory feature bias, which was previously observed with sinewaves, extends to complex sounds. Furthermore, spatiotemporal factors had a weaker influence on correspondence for complex than for simple sounds. This suggests that auditory correspondence might involve different types of correspondence mechanisms.

Indexed as

apparent motionauditory perceptiongroupingmotion correspondenceperceptual organizationTernus display

Identifiers

PMID42293938
PMCPMC13254173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.