SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
What do we know about the effectiveness of the application of hybrid SE-TGfU model in physical education on learning outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, there has been growing interest in the hybridization of different pedagogical models (PMs), such as Sport Education (SE) and Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU), to address underexplored learning outcomes and promote the holistic education of pupils. This study aimed to examine interventions applying a hybrid SE-TGfU model in physical education (PE) to enhance positive learning outcomes in the physical, social, affective, and cognitive domains, and to compare its effects across these domains with those of the Traditional Skill Approach (TSA), isolated SE, and isolated TGfU. Methods: A systematic search of major scientific databases was conducted. Studies were included if they: (1) implemented the hybrid SE-TGfU model as the instructional intervention, (2) compared it with TSA, isolated SE, or isolated TGfU, and (3) reported quantitative learning outcome(s). After applying the eligibility criteria, a total of nine studies, including 22 effect sizes, were included in the analysis. Results: The hybrid SE-TGfU model was associated with larger pooled effect sizes than TSA ( Discussion: The findings suggest that the SE-TGfU hybrid model is associated with larger pooled effect sizes across several learning domains in PE, particularly in the physical, social, and affective domains. However, evidence for the cognitive domain remains inconclusive. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given the substantial heterogeneity and limited evidence base. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251171229.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.